A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Of Character Law In Namibia In Nassau
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Nassau
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
A standard of fault in defamation law that typically requires that the defendant knew of a defamatory statement's falsity or had reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statement when publishing it.
The test for defamation is whether, in the opinion of a reasonable person with ordinary intelligence, the words have the tendency to undermine, subvert, or impair a person's good name, reputation or esteem in the community. A two staged enquiry is adopted in this regard.
These include: There must be a defamatory statement. The defamatory statement must be understood by right-thinking or reasonable minded persons as referring to the plaintiff. There must be a publication of the defamatory statement, that is to say, it must be communicated to some person other than the plaintiff himself.
Warby J drew attention to the principle for the rule set out by Diplock LJ in : "If a man reads four newspapers at breakfast and reads substantially the same libel in each, liability does not depend on which paper he opens first.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
Publication: It must be proved that the defamatory statement was seen, heard, or read by a third party. The statement must be published because if there is no publication, there is no harm to the victim's reputation. Injury: The victim has to prove that the statement caused damage or harm to their reputation.
The publishing of a statement which lowers the individual or the company in the estimation of right thinking members of society generally. Broadly, the test is whether a statement would cause one to think less of the person or company to whom it refers.
Order prohibiting the publication of a defamatory statement. (b) the defendant has no defence to the action that is reasonably likely to succeed.
Truth is the first, and easiest, defense to a defamation claim. As discussed in the elements of defamation, the statement about you must have been false. If a Defendant can show that the statements were true, or even substantially true, then they could defeat a claim for defamation.
The Act abolishes the distinction between libel and slander and the action for defamation may be brought without proof of special damage. There are three traditional elements to the cause of action that the plaintiff must establish, namely publication, identification and defamatory meaning.
