A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Defamation Vs Slander Force In Kings
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Kings
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
In order to have a claim against your opponent as a result of their defamation of your character, you have to be able to prove that their statement has caused you serious harm. This means that that harm caused to you cannot be trivial, and each case will be decided on its own facts.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
What do I need to show to win a defamation case? To win a defamation case, you need to prove that the statement was defamatory, was published, refers to you, and has yielded or is likely to cause severe harm to your reputation.
Who bears the burden of proof in defamation claims in your jurisdiction? Upon the claimant's establishing that the statement complained of is defamatory and has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation, the burden of proof then lies with the defendant.
The statement must be untrue and presented as a factual claim rather than an opinion to be defamation. Additionally, there must be evidence that the statement caused or has the potential to cause significant damage to the reputation of the individual or entity targeted.
Defamation that causes long-term damage, particularly if it affects your career, social standing, or personal life, will result in higher damages than something short-term that might be forgotten within a year. The more severe and lasting the harm, the greater the compensation.
Burden of proof on the defendant While specific legal requirements may differ depending on local laws, the common laws of libel generally only require the claimant to prove that a statement was made by the defendant, and that it was defamatory – a relatively easy element to prove.
Proving the Truth of the Statements The defendant must prove that the defamatory statements were, in fact, true. For instance, if the statements concern the quality of goods or services, the defendant could provide independent testing or other evidence supporting the truth of the claims.
Truth is the best defense to defamation. For example if sued for calling a person a criminal, then the defendant could produce a valid record of a criminal conviction, properly certified and exemplified and the defendant would probably be granted summary judgement.
