I feel that there would be a crop of libels or slanders. What protection would he provide to the public where in such investigatory journalism a person is slandered and libelled? We all expected it to turn up in the form of a private individual suing another private individual because he had been libelled or slandered.
Under Illinois law, the elements of a defamation claim are: (1) a false statement about the plaintiff (2) made to a third party (sometimes referred to by courts as publication) (3) that harms the plaintiff's reputation.
Slander per se is the spoken word version of libel per se—a false statement that is so obviously harmful that damage to a plaintiff's reputation is presumed. Examples of slander per se include false accusations of improper sexual conduct, criminal activity, or bad business dealings.
Slander is a false defamatory statement that is spoken aloud. Libel is a false defamatory statement, but libelous statements are written and disseminated to a third party. The law of slander comes from ancient times when most information was circulated by word of mouth, and a rumor could change someone's life.
Slander can be hard to prove, as the complainant must show the slanderer was driven by malice and knew their claims were false. Slander is different from libel, which are false statements made through print or broadcast.
It is possible for someone to record a document against your property with bad intent. Illinois courts may consider this a “slander” of your property's title and award monetary damages. Slander of title generally occurs when someone maliciously records a false document against your property's title.
The plaintiff must prove that the defendant was negligent if the plaintiff is a private individual. On the other hand, if the plaintiff is a public figure or official, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant acted with actual malice.
In order to state a claim for defamation under Illinois law, the plaintiff must show that the defendant made a false statement concerning plaintiff, that there was an unprivileged publication of the defamatory statement to a third party by the defendant and that the plaintiff was damaged.