A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Elements Of Defamation In Australia In Fairfax
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Fairfax
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Section 2 – Truth It provides defendants with a 'complete' defence to a defamation claim, where the defendant can show the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is 'substantially true'. It is not necessary for the defendant to demonstrate that everything they said was true.
Defamation law recognises that liability can arise as a result of: a positive act where a person has a role in the process of publishing or who controls the publishing forum (such as a blog) publishes defamatory material; or. the failure to prevent or remove defamatory information published by someone else.
What are the fundamental principles of defamation laws in Australia? 1. Burden of Proof: In defamation cases, the burden of proof rests with the individual alleging defamation, referred to as the plaintiff. To succeed in a defamation claim, the plaintiff must provide compelling evidence in support of their case.
The onus of proof lies upon the defendant to establish matters relevant to the defences, such as qualified privilege, but once these elements have been established, the burden of establishing malice lies on the plaintiff, not upon the defendant: Dillon v Cush 2010 NSWCA 165 at 63–67.
Elements, defences, and remedies (2) The communication must identify, or be about the plaintiff. (3) The communication must be defamatory. (4) The plaintiff must prove that the publication has caused (or likely to cause) serious harm.
In the Northern Territory under the Defamation Act, a person who commits defamation can make an offer to the aggrieved person to make amends. The offer will usually be made after the aggrieved person gives the person a concerns notice.
Defamation defences include public interest, truth, honest opinion, absolute privilege, and innocent dissemination.
The defamation reforms have introduced a threshold requirement that the allegedly defamatory matter has caused (or is likely to cause) serious harm to the plaintiff. A person who wishes to take legal action for defamation must be able to prove that they have suffered, or could suffer, 'serious harm'.
Australia has been called the “defamation capital of the world”. Our uncodified, slouchy attachment to freedom of speech has long grappled — often unsuccessfully — with defamation laws that favour individuals with deep pockets and hurt feelings.
A person who wishes to take legal action for defamation must be able to prove that they have suffered, or could suffer, 'serious harm'. If a corporation is suing for defamation, it needs to prove that it has suffered 'serious financial loss' as a result of the publication of the allegedly defamatory matter.
