A form of publication which tends to cause one to lose the esteem of the community is defamation. This is injury to reputation. A person can be held liable for the defamation of another. In order to prove defamation, the plaintiff must prove:
- that a statement was made about the plaintiff's reputation, honesty or integrity that is not true;
- publication to a third party (i.e., another person hears or reads the statement); and
- the plaintiff suffers damages as a result of the statement.
Slander is a form of defamation that consists of making false oral statements about a person which would damage that person's reputation. If one spreads a rumor that his neighbor has been in jail and this is not true, the person making such false statements could be held liable for slander.
Defamation which occurs by written statements is known as libel. Libel also may result from a picture or visual representation. Truth is an absolute defense to slander or libel.
Some statements, while libelous or slanderous, are absolutely privileged in the sense that the statements can be made without fear of a lawsuit for slander. The best example is statements made in a court of law. An untrue statement made about a person in court which damages that person's reputation will generally not cause liability to the speaker as far as slander is concerned. However, if the statement is untrue, the person making it may be liable for criminal perjury.
If a communication is made in good faith on a subject in which the party communicating it has a legitimate right or interest in communicating it, this communication may be exempt from slander liability due to a qualified privileged.
The following form letter demands that someone cease making libelous or slanderous statements, or appropriate legal action will be taken.
Suing For Defamation Of Character In South Africa In Clark
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Clark
Control #:
US-00423BG
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The material that can be considered defamatory is not limited to letters and emails. It could be a photo, a social media comment, text message, blog, video, verbal statement or anything that is communicated to another person.
To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence ; and 4) damages , or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the ...
All statements, written or spoken about you, which diminish your reputation in the eyes of right-thinking people, and which were made with that intention, will give you grounds for an action for damages for defamation.
It's safe to say that pursuing a defamation suit against someone can be difficult, but it is not impossible. To prove defamation, you must determine that the statement can easily be described as false, published, harmful, or unprivileged.
Falsity: The statement must be untrue, misleading or deceptive. Harm: The false statement must have caused harm to the reputation of the person it is about. South African law recognizes harm to one's reputation as an injuria, which means a wrongful act causing harm to a person's dignity or reputation.
Convictions for criminal defamation should only be secured when the allegedly defamatory statements are false – and when the mental element of the crime is satisfied, that is when they are made with the knowledge that the statements were false or with reckless disregard as to whether they were true or false.
Truth, or substantial truth, is a complete defense to a claim of defamation.
Truth is the first, and easiest, defense to a defamation claim. As discussed in the elements of defamation, the statement about you must have been false. If a Defendant can show that the statements were true, or even substantially true, then they could defeat a claim for defamation.
Truth is an absolute defence to defamation. The defendant must prove that the defamatory statements were, in fact, true. For instance, if the statements concern the quality of goods or services, the defendant could provide independent testing or other evidence supporting the truth of the claims.
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required.
