The Court held that, the doctrine of comity requires a court not to pass an order which would be in conflict with another order passed by a competent court of law thus having a party violate a lawful order passed by another court. In Sree Sree Bhabapritananda Ojha v.
The forum conveniens is that which is having the jurisdiction convenient to all to decide the case. The doctrine of forum conveniens is well explained by the Delhi High Court in 'India TV Independent News Service (P) Ltd., V. India Broadcast Live LLC and others' - (2008) 22 CLA BL Supp 37 (Del).
The doctrine is based on the right of the Court in the exercise of its powers to refuse to exercise its jurisdiction and relegate the matter for another forum, where action could be brought, to adjudicate the disputes keeping in mind the convenience of litigants and witnesses and in the interest of justice.
"The doctrine of forum non conveniens permits a US court to decline to exercise its judicial jurisdiction if the court would be a seriously inconvenient forum and if an adequate alternative forum exists."1 In all cases in which the doctrine ...
Basically, a Lis Pendens is written notice that's recorded in the county recorder's records where the real estate is located and that gives notice than an action, a lawsuit involving title to the real estate is pending.
The rule of inconvenience is a legal principle that says a court should not interpret a law in a way that will harm an important public interest or cause serious problems for anyone, unless there is no other choice. This rule helps ensure that laws are fair and do not cause unnecessary harm to people or society.