This form is a sample letter in Word format covering the subject matter of the title of the form.
Pleading For Insanity In Massachusetts
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-0018LTR
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior. Insanity is distinguished from low intelligence or mental deficiency due to age or injury.
A defendant who intends to assert a defense of insanity at the time of the alleged offense must so notify an attorney for the government in writing within the time provided for filing a pretrial motion, or at any later time the court sets, and file a copy of the notice with the clerk.
Penal Code section 1026, et. Seq. Legal insanity requires that the person, by reason of mental disease or defect was incapable of either: Knowing the nature of his or her act. Understanding the nature of his or her act. Distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of commission of the crime.
Primary tabs Insanity & Diminished Capacity. Competency. The ''M'Naghten Rule'' The "Irresistible Impulse" Test. The Durham Rule (The "Product" Test) The Model Penal Code.
Ing to an eight-state study, the insanity defense is used in less than 1% of all court cases and, when used, has only a 26% success rate. Of those cases that were successful, 90% of the defendants had been previously diagnosed with mental illness.
Legal insanity requires that the person, by reason of mental disease or defect was incapable of either: Knowing the nature of his or her act. Understanding the nature of his or her act. Distinguishing between right and wrong at the time of commission of the crime.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 17(b), the burden has been shifted to the defendant to prove the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence.
The ''M'Naghten Rule'' Englishman Daniel M'Naghten shot and killed the secretary of the British Prime Minister, believing that the Prime Minister was conspiring against him. The court acquitted M'Naghten "by reason of insanity," and he was placed in a mental institution for the rest of his life.
The Insanity Defense in Practice Despite public fears, defendants do not abuse the insanity defense. In felony cases, the defense is invoked less than 1% of the time, and even when it is employed, it is only successful 25% of the time.
Since the passage of the Insanity Defense Reform Act, the burden of proof lies on the defendant rather than the government. The defendant must provide "clear and convincing" evidence that, due to a mental illness, he/she did not mean to commit the act or did not realize that the criminal act was wrong.
