Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) The most important ADR program requirement is fairness. Generally, an ADR program is fair if it is voluntary, confidential, enforceable by the parties (if an agreement is reached), and led by a neutral person, like a mediator, who has no personal interest in the dispute.
Disadvantages of ADR: If ADR is unsuccessful, it can delay the court proceedings. Except for arbitration, ADR is not usually legally binding. All parties to the dispute must agree to using ADR. ADR does not guarantee a resolution to the dispute. An ineffective third party can potentially hinder a resolution.
Negotiation is perhaps the simplest and most straightforward type of alternative dispute resolution. The disputing parties meet with one another to identify concerns, explore options, and seek a solution they can agree on. No one else acts as a neutral third party to help them negotiate.
Rule 3.31. Unless otherwise authorized by the court, discovery meet and confer obligations require an in-person, telephonic, or video conference between parties.
Types of ADR include arbitration, mediation, negotiated rulemaking, neutral factfinding, and minitrials.
A neutral party can work with you to resolve your dispute in a variety of ways: A mediator can help you reach a solution. An arbitrator can make a decision. An evaluator can offer their opinion.
How is the process initiated? An ADR Process may be initiated by the parties at any time after all parties have appeared in the case, by filing a Stipulation to ADR with the Civil Clerk's Office.
A Dispute Resolution Board (DRB) is a form of alternative dispute resolution typically used on larger construction projects such as highway and transportation projects. A DRB is proactively appointed on a project before any disputes arise.
Many legal disputes are resolved through direct negotiation, often based on a lawyer's advice, but without formally filing a claim to commence litigation. In fact, only a small percentage of litigated cases proceed through trial.