Agreement Arbitrate Document Without Comments In Massachusetts

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-0009BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

Online arbitration is different from traditional arbitration. The common thought that online arbitration is just the combination of online mechanisms and traditional arbitration is not true. The main thesis of this article is that online arbitration is different from traditional arbitration not only because it is held online or partly online but also because its definition elements may vary from those of traditional arbitration definition. The article aims to provide an inclusive and precise definition of online arbitration and extract different types of online arbitration from the definition accordingly. In order to define online arbitration accurately, it is helpful to look closely at the component elements of traditional arbitration from which it evolved. Naturally, there is much commonality across the two forms, but also relevant differences in the detail of component elements of both. Moreover, some component elements may not be shared at all, belonging uniquely to just one form of arbitration. A study of the component elements of both forms is therefore necessary to provide a definition of online arbitration.
Free preview
  • Preview Agreement to Arbitrate Online
  • Preview Agreement to Arbitrate Online
  • Preview Agreement to Arbitrate Online
  • Preview Agreement to Arbitrate Online
  • Preview Agreement to Arbitrate Online

Form popularity

FAQ

As in most states, Massachusetts law allows parties to choose arbitration, rather than trial in the court system, to reach final resolution of their disputes. Parties agree on an impartial arbitrator with training and experience in the specific area of law involved in the dispute.

While substantive arbitrability is presumptively decided by the courts, parties can vary that presumption by agreeing to arbitrate even those gateway issues. Often called a “delegation clause,” the contractual provision delegates authority to the arbitrator.

Parties who wish to refer a matter to arbitration shall sign a written agreement to arbitrate which shall be enforceable in ance with the provisions of section one of chapter two hundred and fifty-one.

If a court finds any evidence of substantive unconscionability, it will deem the agreement unenforceable. It does not take more than a low level of substantive unconscionability for the agreement to be thrown out.

A party is deceived, intimidated, or coerced during the execution of the arbitration agreement and requests a declaration that such arbitration agreement is invalid; and. The arbitration agreement violates prohibitions specified by the law.

The Arbitration Agreement All and any disputes or differences arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof shall be finally settled by arbitration. In ance with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The number of arbitrators shall be one/three.

Outline a concise factual background and then move on to a discussion of the issues at the heart of the case. Your arguments should flow easily from the relevant facts and applicable law. And, by all means, avoid exaggeration of the strengths of your case as well as disparagement of the opposing side.

For an arbitration agreement to be comprehensive, it must cover the points including a clear reference to arbitration, the seat of arbitration, the scope of dispute, the language of the arbitral tribunal, and the law that will govern the substantive and procedural aspects of the arbitration.

Is arbitration legal? Yes. The Federal Arbitration Act, or FAA, was passed in 1925 in response to a variety of court decisions that held arbitration agreements unenforceable. This law provides that arbitration agreements are generally valid and enforceable.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Agreement Arbitrate Document Without Comments In Massachusetts