This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Wrongful Interference With A Contract In Minnesota
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000303
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm.
Common Affirmative Defenses to a Breach of Contract Claim The contract was supposed to be in writing. The contract is indefinite. There is a mistake. You lacked capacity to contract. You were fraudulently induced to enter into a contract. The contract is unconscionable. Estoppel. The contract is illegal.
If your situation meets the required elements for a legal claim, you absolutely can. In California, intentionally interfering with another person's expected inheritance is a tort (a civil wrong, which allows a person to sue another person in court, assuming the elements are met).
To recover damages for inducing breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove that: The plaintiff was in a valid contractual relationship with a third party; The defendant knew of the existing contract; The defendant intended to induce the third party to breach the contract with the plaintiff;
Once the plaintiff proves that a valid contract existed, they must show that they upheld their part. After that, the plaintiff must show that the defendant did not fulfill their obligations. And finally there must be evidence of actual damages that the plaintiff suffered as a result.
To succeed in a claim of tortious interference with the performance of a contract, someone must show that the interfering party caused the contract to not be performed. Additionally, someone must prove that the interfering party intentionally caused the breach of contract and did so improperly.
The contract was valid. An outside (third) party had knowledge of this contract. The outside party purposefully and wrongfully disrupted the contractual relationship. The outside party's interference with the contract caused harm to the relationship.
More info
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that "tortious interference with prospective economic advantage" is a viable claim under Minnesota law. In Minnesota, a claim can be brought for the wrongful interference with noncontractual as well as contractual business relationships.In certain situations, Minnesota law allows victims of tortious contract interference to pursue legal damages. Wrongful or tortious interference with contracts happens when a thirdparty intentionally causes a contracting party to commit a breach of contract. Uniform Commercial Code. In Minnesota, you may be able to sue someone who improperly interferes with a likely business relationship. Tortious interference with a contract occurs when a third party intentionally damages the contractual between two parties. Tortious interference with prospective economic advantage is a viable claim in Minnesota. 6, Unfair Trade Practices; Ch. 7, False Statements in a Business Context; and Ch. 11, Franchise Law. 6, Unfair Trade Practices; Ch. 7, False Statements in a Business Context; and Ch. 11, Franchise Law.