This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Wrongful Interference With A Business Relationship Example In Michigan
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000303
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Explanation. Wrongful interference with a business relationship requires three elements: 1) the third party must have knowledge of the business relationship, 2) the third party must act intentionally with the purpose of disrupting that relationship, and 3) the interference must be wrongful or improper.
Business interference, often known as tortious interference, involves one party intentionally damaging another's business relationships or contracts. For instance, if you own a bakery, and a competitor tries to convince your flour supplier not to sell to you anymore, that competitor is interfering with your business.
Understanding Wrongful Interference Wrongful Interference with an Existing Contract: This happens when a third party knowingly causes one party to breach a legally enforceable contract. For example, persuading a supplier to break an exclusive distribution agreement to favor a competitor qualifies as interference.
Tortious interference with contract arises when a defendant intentionally convinces or causes a third party to breach its contract with the plaintiff, which results in damages to the plaintiff.
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Some examples of actionable interference may include convincing a shared supplier to renege on a contract or a third party interrupting the sale of property to a business.
Disruption of the relationship; Harm to the plaintiff; and. A causal connection between the wrongful act and the harm.
Tortious interference with prospective or anticipated contractual relations is defined in Section 766B of the Restatement (Second) of Torts as: “Inducing or otherwise causing a third person not to enter into or continue the prospective relation or (b) preventing the other from acquiring or continuing the relation.”