This form is a Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages. Plaintiff filed this action against defendant for breaching a non-competition agreement. Plaintiff also contends that the harm suffered as a result of defendant's conduct is irreparable in nature and cannot be measured solely in terms of monetary damages.
Injunctive Relief For Defamation In Maricopa
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Maricopa
Control #:
US-000302
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Every county in Arizona has at least two justice courts. The justice courts have exclusive authority to hear cases in which the amount in controversy is $10,000 or less. Cases in which the amount in controversy is greater than $10,000 must be filed in the superior court.
There are two types of lawsuits: civil and criminal. When someone is charged with a crime and then prosecuted by the government, this is a criminal lawsuit. Other types of suits are civil lawsuits.
A civil action filed in a limited jurisdiction court is a claim against another party for damages of an amount up to $10,000.00. These lawsuits are designed to resolve civil disputes before a justice of the peace. Parties in a civil lawsuit may be represented by attorneys and appeal their case to a higher court.
A small claims lawsuit is a claim against another party for damages of an amount less than $3,500.00.
Justice courts hear lawsuits when the amount in dispute is $10,000 or less, including: Eviction Actions and Landlord & Tenant Disputes.
The statute of limitations in Arizona is set at two years for all personal injury claims. It is one year for libel or slander claims, which are a subset of personal injury law.
Small Claims. Resolving civil disputes if damages are less than $3,500. A small claims lawsuit is a claim against another party for damages of an amount less than $3,500.00. These lawsuits are designed to resolve civil disputes in front of a small claims hearing officer or a Justice of the Peace.
California Supreme Court Holds that Defamatory Speech May Be Enjoined After Trial. On April 26, 2007, a fractured California Supreme Court determined that a defendant may be permanently enjoined from repeating statements that have been adjudicated at trial to be defamatory.