Plaintiff seeks to recover damages from her employer for employment discrimination and sexual harassment. Plaintiff states in her complaint that the acts of the defendant are so outrageous that punitive damages are due up to and including attorney fees.
Title Vii Rights With Cps In Alameda
State:
Multi-State
County:
Alameda
Control #:
US-000296
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The County of Alameda prohibits discrimination or harassment based on the following categories: race (inclusive of traits historically associated with race, such as hair texture and protective hairstyles including braids, locks, and twists), color, religion, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming ...
A: In California, when children are removed by Child Protective Services (CPS), parents still retain specific rights unless otherwise ordered by the court. These rights include visitation and communication, among others.
A: In California, individuals have the right to bring lawsuits against government agencies, including Child Protective Services (CPS). If you believe CPS has acted wrongfully towards you or your child, you may consider filing a claim for violations of your civil rights or for emotional distress.
Under California law, parental rights can be voluntarily or involuntarily terminated. There are two methods regarding the voluntary termination of parental rights and four methods for the involuntary termination of such rights.
If CPS or law enforcement reasonably believe a child is in immediate danger, even if they don't have a warrant, they can remove a child. For example, if the child requires urgent medical care or has experienced serious harm.
Yes, you or your child can refuse to talk to CPS unless they have a warrant or a cout order. However, the difficulty with refusing to talk to CPS is that they are a powerful agency with a well-earned reputation for stepping all over the rights of the folks that they are investigation.
Perhaps the biggest difference between FEHA and Title VII has to do with Title VII's requirement of actual or threatened discipline if the employee does not fulfill the job duty which has caused a dispute involving the employee's religion while FEHA merely requires a conflict between the religious belief and the ...
In fact, the title defines an employee as simply "an individual employed by an employer." Therefore, assuming they work — or are applying to work — for a covered employer as outlined above, Title VII provides discrimination protection for all employees, former employees, and those applying to be employees.
They continue to name individual supervisors and human resources directors as individual defendants despite case law that generally holds individuals cannot be found liable under some of the most common federal employment discrimination laws: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities ...
Federal, state, and local laws prohibit racial and other discrimination in housing. Nonetheless, discrimination persists and can be difficult to prove. Winning a case may require good documentation and patience. Fair housing groups can render assistance.