Attorney Client Privilege For A Corporation In Queens

State:
Multi-State
County:
Queens
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

In this complaint, plaintiff charges defendants with intentional interference with the attorney/client relationship. The plaintiff states that the actions of the defendants in interfering with the attorney/client relationship were willful, wanton, malicious and obtrusive and that punitive damages should be accessed against the defendants.

Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship

Form popularity

FAQ

This protection extends to any information exchanged during these privileged communications, encompassing not only verbal discussions but also written correspondence, emails, text messages, and other forms of communication. The privilege belongs to the client, meaning they have the authority to waive or invoke it.

Since engagement agreements may not be protected by attorney-client privilege, an attorney must be careful not to be overly detailed in the description of the scope of services.

New York uses the territorial test, applying the privilege law of the state where the legal proceeding occurs (i.e. the state where evidence is introduced or where the discovery proceeding occurs). Because New York does not provide an accountant-client privilege, PwC's records were not protected from discovery.

The Garner Fiduciary Exception Where a fiduciary duty is owed to the shareholder or member, that shareholder or member must show good cause why the attorney-client privilege should not protect those communications from disclosure.

There are three primary occasions when solicitor‑client privilege may be overruled, namely when innocence at stake is engaged, the client's communications are themselves criminal, or it is necessary to protect public safety. Any piercing of privilege should be considered an "extraordinary measure."

Unless the client waives the privilege, an attorney or his or her employee, or any person who obtains without the knowledge of the client evidence of a confidential communication made between the attorney or his or her employee and the client in the course of professional employment, shall not disclose, or be allowed ...

A decision recently issued by the New York Supreme Court (County of Saratoga) illustrates one of these exceptions — the “fiduciary exception.” The court ruled that the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege enabled the minority owner of a multi-company family business to obtain information about ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Attorney Client Privilege For A Corporation In Queens