• US Legal Forms

Use Of Deception In Research In Ohio

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint filed in the United States District Court concerning the fraudulent practices related to a life insurance policy. It presents a case where the plaintiff alleges that the defendants, two insurance corporations, engaged in deceptive sales tactics, specifically regarding the 'vanishing premium' concept that misled the plaintiff into believing he would not need to pay premiums after age 65. Key features of the complaint include the identification of the parties involved, detailed allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and concealment of crucial information regarding the insurance policy's performance. The document outlines specific deceptive practices, the failure of the defendants to provide proper training to their agents, and the emotional distress experienced by the plaintiff due to these actions. For attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants, this form serves as a critical basis for understanding litigations involving insurance fraud and the misuse of marketing tactics. It also provides guidance on filing a complaint and the necessary elements to prove fraud in Ohio. The document encourages stakeholders to navigate legal rights and potential remedies effectively.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The study must not involve more than minimal risk to the subjects. The use of deceptive methods must be justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value.

The debriefing is an essential part of the informed consent process and is mandatory when the research study involves use of deception. The debriefing provides participants with a full explanation of the hypothesis being tested, procedures to deceive participants and the reason(s) why it was necessary to deceive them.

Deception with debriefing Less than full disclosure at the outset should, in general, be easily handled by providing participants with a full explanation at the end of the study, in the form of a verbal or written debriefing, followed by re-consent.

For studies involving deception, debriefing materials should explain the design and procedures used for deception, and the reason(s) why deception was necessary. After debriefing participants in studies that have involved deception, it may be necessary to re-consent participants.

For studies involving deception, debriefing materials should explain the design and procedures used for deception, and the reason(s) why deception was necessary. After debriefing participants in studies that have involved deception, it may be necessary to re-consent participants.

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

Here are some steps you can take to on how to deal with deception in a relationship: Confront the person. Listen to their perspective. Forgive. Consider the impact of the deception. Set boundaries. Take time to process your emotions.

Deception studies provide participants with an alternative explanation for the purpose of the study or provide them with misleading information about the study. Some studies may not directly deceive the participant but will withhold some information, such as the reason why a participant was selected for the study.

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

8.07 Deception in Research (a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Use Of Deception In Research In Ohio