• US Legal Forms

Deceptive Practices In Research In Houston

State:
Multi-State
City:
Houston
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This document is a complaint filed in the United States District Court regarding deceptive practices in research as they pertain to a life insurance policy sold in Houston. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants, a foreign corporation and its local counterpart, engaged in fraudulent behavior by misrepresenting the features of the life insurance policy. Specifically, the plaintiff was assured that premiums would vanish at age 65, which turned out to be false. The complaint outlines various ways in which the defendants concealed critical information regarding the policy's performance and misled the plaintiff about the actual cost of coverage, relying on unrealistic dividend projections. Key features of the form include sections for detailing the parties involved, a chronological narrative of events, and specific allegations of fraud. Filling instructions call for precise information about the plaintiff, defendants, and the circumstances surrounding the complaint. This document holds particular significance for attorneys, partners, and paralegals working in insurance law, as it provides a framework for addressing fraudulent practices and seeking damages. Legal assistants may find the clear structure useful for understanding the nature of claims related to deceptive sales tactics in the insurance industry.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

Disclosure is one commonly accepted method of managing financial relationships in order to minimize possible threats to scientific objectivity, the safety of research participants, or public trust in the integrity of clinical research.

Deception or incomplete disclosure should only be used when no reasonably effective, alternative methods are available to achieve the goals of the research. Only study procedures that involve minimal risks (as determined by the IRB) can include deception or incomplete disclosure.

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.

Examples of Active Deceptive Research Participants complete a quiz and are falsely told that they did poorly, regardless of their performance. Participants who do not know they are in a research study are observed to see how they behave when they find valuables (e.g., wallet, laptop) unattended in a public location.

Deception and incomplete disclosure are permissible in research with scientific value that would not be otherwise feasible without the use of deceptive procedures.

One of the best ways to avoid giving misinformation and violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act is to ensure that the information you provide is accurate and factually supported. Always double-check your facts and sources before sharing information.

What Are the Elements of Misappropriation of Trade Secrets in Texas? Under the TUTSA, a plaintiff must be able to prove two elements: Plaintiff had a legally recognizable trade secret; and. Defendant misappropriated the trade secret.

Elements of a DTPA Claim Generally, to prevail on a DTPA claim, plaintiffs must establish three elements: The plaintiff is a consumer; The defendant engaged in false, misleading, or deceptive acts; and. The acts were a producing cause of the consumer's damages.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Deceptive Practices In Research In Houston