This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
4th Amendment In Us Constitution In Riverside
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Riverside
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ...
McDowell, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the fourth amendment is not applicable to searches by private parties, even when such searches are clearly illegal. While evidence obtained during searches by private individuals is admissible, the application of the Burdeau rule is subject to several limitations.
In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless a specific exception applies.
To claim a violation of Fourth Amendment rights as the basis for suppressing relevant evidence, courts have long required that the claimant must prove that they were the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing.
Generally, a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy for property and personal effects they hold open to the public. The Fourth Amendment does not protect things that are visible or in "plain view" for a person of ordinary and unenhanced vision.
McDowell, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the fourth amendment is not applicable to searches by private parties, even when such searches are clearly illegal. While evidence obtained during searches by private individuals is admissible, the application of the Burdeau rule is subject to several limitations.
To claim a violation of Fourth Amendment rights as the basis for suppressing relevant evidence, courts have long required that the claimant must prove that they were the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing.
—“The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another.