4th Amendment To Constitution In Philadelphia

State:
Multi-State
County:
Philadelphia
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a Complaint form used in legal proceedings related to violations of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution in Philadelphia. It addresses issues such as malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and emotional distress caused by wrongful actions of a defendant. The form includes sections for identifying the plaintiff and defendant, outlining the facts of the case, and detailing the damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's actions. Key features include spaces for specific details about the incident, the nature of the alleged wrongful actions, and the damages being sought. Legal professionals, including attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants can utilize this form to initiate a lawsuit effectively. To fill out the form, users should follow a clear structure, ensuring all information is accurately provided and relevant dates are included. Editing instructions stress clarity and specificity, helping ensure the complaint meets legal standards. This form serves as a critical tool for individuals aiming to seek justice against unlawful actions perpetrated by others.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For False Arrest and Imprisonment - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement agents need probable cause, and a warrant in most cases, to search your person or belongings.

The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions from unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrant to search any place or to seize any person or things shall issue without describing them as nearly as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation subscribed to by ...

Brendlin v. California. This Fourth Amendment activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Brendlin v. California, dealing with search and seizure during a traffic stop.

Brendlin v. California. This Fourth Amendment activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Brendlin v. California, dealing with search and seizure during a traffic stop.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ...

Other well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement include consensual searches, certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, and seizures of items in plain view.

In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.

About the expectation itself, the Supreme Court has explained that what "a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected."

The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

4th Amendment To Constitution In Philadelphia