• US Legal Forms

Writ Of Assistance Revolutionary War In Wayne

State:
Multi-State
County:
Wayne
Control #:
US-000277
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.

Free preview
  • Preview Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody - Lack of Voluntariness - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
  • Preview Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody - Lack of Voluntariness - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
  • Preview Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody - Lack of Voluntariness - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
  • Preview Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody - Lack of Voluntariness - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Form popularity

FAQ

The Writs of Assistance were documents that enabled British soldiers unfettered access to search colonial homes and businesses while seizing property. Just prior to the American Revolutionary War, they represented the growing mistrust between the colonists and the British.

A writ of assistance is an order directing that a party convey, deliver, or turn over a deed, document, or right of ownership. This writ, which may also be called a writ of restitution or writ of possession, usually serves as an eviction from real property.

Colonists and Many British observers were outraged at the blatant neglect of what had been traditionally considered British liberties. Most notably, the writs allowed officials to enter and ransack private homes without proving probable cause for suspicion, a traditional prerequisite to a search.

Among the grounds for which the colonists opposed the writs were that they were permanent and even transferable; the holder of a writ could assign it to another; any place could be searched at the whim of the holder; and searchers were not responsible for any damage they caused.

Among the grounds for which the colonists opposed the writs were that they were permanent and even transferable; the holder of a writ could assign it to another; any place could be searched at the whim of the holder; and searchers were not responsible for any damage they caused.

The Writs, essentially a court order, granted immense power to customs officials, which unsettled the colonists. James Otis, a lawyer, raised an argument against the Writs soon after their establishment that eventually reached the Superior Court of Massachusetts.

These writs were enacted under the Revenue Act, which was part of the Townshend Acts of 1767. Writs of Assistance violated colonists' individual rights because they undermined the rights to privacy and protection from unwarranted searches.

1. : a writ issued to a law officer (such as a sheriff or marshal) for the enforcement of a court order or decree. especially : one used to enforce an order for the possession of lands. 2. : a writ used especially in colonial America authorizing a law officer to search in unspecified locations for unspecified illegal ...

In 1761, he had opposed as unjust and unconstitutional British officials' searches and seizures of colonists' property by declaring that “a man's house is his castle.” In his 1764 pamphlet, Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved, he explained why taxation without representation amounted to tyranny.

James Otis (1725–83) was a lawyer in Massachusetts and a member of the Massachusetts Legislature. In the mid-1760s he wrote a number of important pamphlets in favor of American independence and is said to have coined the revolutionary phrase “no taxation without representation”.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Writ Of Assistance Revolutionary War In Wayne