We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Typically, a person can prove their innocence by providing evidence, alibis, or witnesses. However, in a court of law, they're presumed innocent by default.
No, if a juror has reasonable doubt about the person's guilt, they should vote for not guilty. It's a key part of ensuring justice.
If they can't meet the burden of proof, the accused should be found not guilty. It's as simple as that – no proof, no conviction!
It's important because it protects individuals from wrongful convictions and ensures that everyone gets a fair chance before any judgment is made.
Reasonable doubt is the standard used in criminal cases. It means that if there's even a small possibility that the accused might be innocent, they should be found not guilty.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution. They have to provide enough evidence to convince the judge or jury that the accused is guilty.
It means that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. In other words, you can't assume someone did something wrong just because they were accused.