We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form
Description
Pattern Jury Instructions from the 11th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. For more information and to use the online Instruction builder please visit http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/pattern-jury-instructions
Yes, an accomplice is actively involved in a crime, while a bystander is just a witness who saw something but didn’t participate. Think of it like the difference between a player and a spectator in a game.
If a witness lies on the stand, it’s called perjury, and they could face serious consequences, including jail time. Honesty is the best policy, even in court.
It depends on the immunity agreement. If they have immunity, they can share their experiences without fear of being charged. It's a bit of a safety net.
Not necessarily. Since accomplices may have their own agendas, their testimonies can sometimes be questionable. It's wise to take their words with a grain of salt.
Using addictive drugs can cloud a witness's judgment and memory, making their testimony less reliable. It's like trying to see through muddy water; you might not get a clear picture.
A testimony of an accomplice is when someone who was involved in a crime shares their experience in court to help the prosecution. It's like a partner in crime turning on the other.