Harris County, Texas, Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document commonly filed in civil court cases to request the court to rule in favor of one party without a trial, based on the undisputed facts and applicable law. This motion aims to conclude the case efficiently by eliminating the need for a trial when there is no genuine issue of material fact. One type of Motion for Summary Judgment in Harris County, Texas, is the Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment. In this type of motion, the party moving for summary judgment must conclusively establish that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment provides a persuasive argument and supporting evidence demonstrating that no reasonable jury could reach a different conclusion. Another type of Motion for Summary Judgment in Harris County, Texas, is the No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment. With this motion, the moving party challenges the non-moving party to present specific evidence that supports their claims or defenses. If the non-moving party fails to do so, the court may grant the motion, thereby ruling in favor of the moving party. To draft a Harris County, Texas, Motion for Summary Judgment, the party must include relevant keywords such as "summary judgment," "Harris County," "Texas," "motion," "undisputed facts," "law," "genuine issue of material fact," "Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment," "No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment," "conclusively establish," "entitled to judgment as a matter of law," "persuasive argument," "supporting evidence," and "reasonable jury." In summary, a Harris County, Texas, Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document used to request the court to rule in favor of one party without a trial, based on the undisputed facts and applicable law. Different types include the Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment and the No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment, each requiring a specific approach to convince the court of the moving party's entitlement to judgment.
Harris Texas Motion for Summary Judgment
Description
How to fill out Harris Texas Motion For Summary Judgment?
Laws and regulations in every area differ around the country. If you're not an attorney, it's easy to get lost in a variety of norms when it comes to drafting legal documents. To avoid costly legal assistance when preparing the Harris Motion for Summary Judgment, you need a verified template legitimate for your county. That's when using the US Legal Forms platform is so beneficial.
US Legal Forms is a trusted by millions online collection of more than 85,000 state-specific legal forms. It's a perfect solution for specialists and individuals looking for do-it-yourself templates for various life and business situations. All the documents can be used multiple times: once you purchase a sample, it remains available in your profile for subsequent use. Thus, if you have an account with a valid subscription, you can just log in and re-download the Harris Motion for Summary Judgment from the My Forms tab.
For new users, it's necessary to make some more steps to get the Harris Motion for Summary Judgment:
- Examine the page content to make sure you found the appropriate sample.
- Take advantage of the Preview option or read the form description if available.
- Look for another doc if there are inconsistencies with any of your requirements.
- Click on the Buy Now button to obtain the template once you find the appropriate one.
- Choose one of the subscription plans and log in or create an account.
- Choose how you prefer to pay for your subscription (with a credit card or PayPal).
- Select the format you want to save the document in and click Download.
- Fill out and sign the template on paper after printing it or do it all electronically.
That's the simplest and most cost-effective way to get up-to-date templates for any legal purposes. Find them all in clicks and keep your paperwork in order with the US Legal Forms!
Form popularity
FAQ
Harris. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought by a motorist who was paralyzed after the officer ran his eluding vehicle off the road during a high-speed car chase.
Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) A claim of excessive force by law enforcement during an arrest, stop, or other seizure of an individual is subject to the objective reasonableness standard of the Fourth Amendment, rather than a substantive due process standard under the Fourteenth Amendment.
On Monday February 26, 2007 the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Scott v. Harris, a case stemming from a high-speed pursuit in Coweta County Georgia. Harris, the motorist was speeding through Coweta County which drew the attention of law enforcement.
In a summary judgment proceeding, the nonmovant is entitled to 21-days notice of the hearing or submission.
The Court concluded that it is reasonable for a police officer to use deadly force to prevent harm to innocent bystanders, even to the point of putting the fleeing motorist at serious risk of injury or death.
(1) TO SURVIVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT, A NON-MOVING PARTY MUST COME FORWARD WITH COMPETENT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH A GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT.
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought by a motorist who was paralyzed after the officer ran his eluding vehicle off the road during a high-speed car chase.
The Court rules that a police officer's attempt to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even when it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury or death.
Summary judgment motions do have a timeline for filing and response. First, a summary judgment motion must be on file at least 21 days before it can be heard. (TRCP 166a) Second, any opposing affidavits or written response should be on file no later than 7 days before the hearing. (Id.)
A response and brief to an opposed motion must be filed within 21 days from the date the motion is filed. Time for Reply Briefs. Unless otherwise directed by the presiding judge, a party who has filed an opposed motion may file a reply brief within 14 days from the date the response is filed.