Choosing the best legal document web template can be a struggle. Naturally, there are a lot of templates available online, but how do you discover the legal type you will need? Utilize the US Legal Forms web site. The service provides a huge number of templates, including the West Virginia Jury Instruction - 1.2 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care, which you can use for organization and private needs. All the kinds are inspected by specialists and satisfy state and federal demands.
Should you be already signed up, log in to the accounts and click the Obtain switch to have the West Virginia Jury Instruction - 1.2 Duty To Mitigate In General Pursuing Medical Care. Make use of your accounts to check with the legal kinds you may have purchased earlier. Check out the My Forms tab of your respective accounts and acquire another version of the document you will need.
Should you be a brand new end user of US Legal Forms, here are basic guidelines so that you can adhere to:
US Legal Forms is the most significant library of legal kinds in which you can discover a variety of document templates. Utilize the service to obtain skillfully-made papers that adhere to express demands.
These official Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions are referred to as "CACI" (pronounced "Casey"), which stands for California Civil Instructions. Advisory Committee on Civil Jury Instructions.
The defendant must prove [duress] [coercion] [compulsion] by a preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks to prove are more probably true than not true.
Punitive damages are awarded in less than 5 percent of civil jury verdicts, ing to a 1990 American Bar Foundation study of 25,000 jury verdicts in 11 states over a four-year period.
"Punitive damages" are awarded against a defendant for the purpose of punishing the defendant for its misconduct, or to deter one or both Defendants and others like such defendant from committing such conduct in the future.
418, the California Supreme Court articulated 'three guideposts' for courts reviewing punitive damages: ?(1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct; (2) the disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damages award; and (3) the difference between the ...
You may award punitive damages only if you find that the defendant's conduct that harmed the plaintiff was malicious, oppressive or in reckless disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff.
When a party has the burden of proving any claim [or affirmative defense] by a preponderance of the evidence, it means you must be persuaded by the evidence that the claim [or affirmative defense] is more probably true than not true.
In addition to compensatory damages, juries in some cases may also award punitive damages, a class of damages which serve to punish unlawful conduct and to deter similar future conduct. BMW of North Am., Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 568 (1996).