This lease rider form may be used when you are involved in a lease transaction, and in the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the printed terms of this Lease and added terms of the Lease, the added terms shall control and be deemed to supersede the printed terms of the Lease.
Washington Conflicts Between Printed Form and Added Terms is a legal concept that pertains to conflicts arising in contracts or agreements when there is a clash between printed form provisions and additional terms inserted later. This conflict often occurs in standard form contracts commonly used in various industries, such as insurance policies, lease agreements, and purchase contracts. In Washington state, which has specific laws governing contract formation and interpretation, conflicts between printed form provisions and added terms are handled differently based on the type of conflicts that arise. There are generally two main types of conflicts that can occur: 1. Conflicts between conflicting printed form provisions: This type of conflict arises when there are multiple printed form provisions within a contract that contradict each other. For example, if a lease agreement includes two conflicting clauses regarding the tenant's responsibility for property maintenance, a conflict between these provisions would need to be resolved. 2. Conflicts between added terms and printed form provisions: This type of conflict occurs when additional terms or clauses are added to a contract after the printed form provisions have been established. These added terms may be inserted through negotiations between the parties or as handwritten modifications. If the added terms conflict with the existing printed form provisions, a conflict between the two arises. In Washington, when conflicts between printed form provisions and added terms arise, the courts follow certain rules to resolve these conflicts. These rules are designed to interpret the contract in a manner that gives effect to the parties' intent while also considering public policy and fairness. Some key factors that courts consider in resolving these conflicts include: 1. Express integration clauses: If the contract contains an express integration clause stating that the written contract represents the complete agreement between the parties, it may give greater weight to the printed form provisions and limit the effect of added terms. 2. Terms imposed by statute or legal interpretation: In some cases, statutes or legal principles may provide default rules that override conflicting provisions. For example, certain consumer protection laws may render certain printed form provisions unenforceable, regardless of added terms. 3. Rule of construction: If the court determines that the contract is ambiguous or unclear, it may apply the rule of construction to interpret the contract in favor of the party who did not draft the contract or who is not responsible for the conflict. It is crucial for parties involved in a contract to carefully review and understand both the printed form provisions and any added terms to avoid conflicts and ensure clarity in their contractual obligations. Seeking legal advice or consulting experienced contract professionals is advisable to navigate the complexities and potential conflicts that may arise in Washington regarding printed form and added terms.
