Tennessee Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense provides guidance to juries regarding the application of the comparative negligence defense in civil cases. In Tennessee, the comparative negligence doctrine allows a jury to allocate fault between multiple parties involved in an accident or an incident leading to damages. This instruction assists juries in determining the respective degree of negligence exhibited by each party, aiding them in the apportionment of liability and the subsequent evaluation of damages. When it comes to different types or variations of Tennessee Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense, there might not be specific variations under the same instruction number. However, other related instructions may cover specific scenarios or elements of comparative negligence, such as: 1. Tennessee Jury Instruction — 6.6.— - Comparative Negligence Determination: This instruction may guide juries in evaluating evidence, identifying negligent parties, determining their respective fault percentages, and calculating the damages accordingly. 2. Tennessee Jury Instruction — 6.6.— - Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction might be used when the case falls under the doctrine of pure comparative negligence. Under this system, each party is responsible for damages proportionate to their degree of fault, regardless of whether it exceeds 50%. 3. Tennessee Jury Instruction — 6.6.— - Modified Comparative Negligence: This instruction could be employed when the jurisdiction follows the doctrine of modified comparative negligence. In this system, a party may only recover damages if their percentage of fault is below a certain threshold (often 50% or 51%). It is essential for juries to carefully consider the evidence presented and apply the appropriate instructions to ensure a fair and just allocation of fault in accordance with Tennessee law. By providing clear guidance on the comparative negligence defense, these jury instructions aim to promote consistency, accuracy, and fairness in determining liability and damages in civil cases.