This form is a sample set of interrogatories submitted by the plaintiff to the defendant in a personal injury case involving claims of wrongful termination and failure to pay Workmen's Compensation benefits.
South Carolina Interrogatories to Defendant - Worker's Compensation - Wrongful Termination
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-PI-0252
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
How to fill out Interrogatories To Defendant - Worker's Compensation - Wrongful Termination?
Have you been in the situation in which you require papers for sometimes business or personal reasons almost every time? There are a lot of legal papers themes available on the net, but finding kinds you can rely isn`t simple. US Legal Forms gives 1000s of kind themes, much like the South Carolina Interrogatories to Defendant - Worker's Compensation - Wrongful Termination, which are created to meet state and federal demands.
When you are previously knowledgeable about US Legal Forms site and have an account, simply log in. After that, you are able to download the South Carolina Interrogatories to Defendant - Worker's Compensation - Wrongful Termination format.
Unless you provide an accounts and need to start using US Legal Forms, follow these steps:
- Find the kind you need and make sure it is for that proper metropolis/state.
- Take advantage of the Preview switch to review the shape.
- Read the outline to ensure that you have selected the appropriate kind.
- In case the kind isn`t what you`re searching for, utilize the Look for industry to discover the kind that meets your requirements and demands.
- When you obtain the proper kind, click Buy now.
- Select the costs prepare you need, fill in the required details to make your bank account, and pay for the order with your PayPal or bank card.
- Decide on a practical document structure and download your copy.
Get every one of the papers themes you have purchased in the My Forms menu. You can get a additional copy of South Carolina Interrogatories to Defendant - Worker's Compensation - Wrongful Termination whenever, if possible. Just go through the necessary kind to download or printing the papers format.
Use US Legal Forms, the most substantial variety of legal forms, to save time as well as steer clear of faults. The support gives professionally produced legal papers themes which can be used for an array of reasons. Produce an account on US Legal Forms and initiate producing your lifestyle a little easier.
Form popularity
FAQ
Usually, lawyers use interrogatories to obtain detailed information about persons, corporations, facts, witnesses, and identity and locations of records and documents.
You can use interrogatories to find out facts about a case but they cannot be used for questions that draw a legal conclusion.
Interrogatories are often preferable to depositions for identi- fying such things as witnesses, documents, the dates and sub- stance of transactions and conversations,3 since a deponent may easily forget or overlook relevant information when an- swering such questions.
Examples of good, specific contention interrogatories include: Do you contend that plaintiff's claim is barred by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure § 339? Do you contend that plaintiff is the owner of Blackacre?
Generally, interrogatories are objectionable if they seek information that is not within the scope of discovery as defined in Maryland Rule 402 or Federal Rule 26(b). These are typically requests that are not relevant, unduly burdensome, broad, vague, privileged. or protected by the work product doctrine.
Your answers to the interrogatories should usually be short, clear, and direct and should answer only the question that is being asked. This is not the time to set out your entire case or defense to the other side. Take the time to make sure your answers are correct and truthful.
However, you can object to interrogatories that call for legal conclusions. You can also object to questions if they are not at all related to the court case. To object, you need to write out the reasons for the objection instead of answering the question.