Rhode Island Motion to Invoke the Rule Prior to Void Dire and To Enjoin the District Attorney From Advising Witnesses of Previous Testimony is a legal procedure utilized within the state of Rhode Island, specifically during a trial. This motion aims to prevent the district attorney from informing witnesses about the testimony given by others involved in the case prior to their own testimony. By invoking this rule, the defense seeks to maintain the credibility and integrity of witness testimony by ensuring that their statements are not influenced or tainted by knowledge of previous testimonies. This allows for a more fair and impartial trial by preventing potential bias or manipulation of witnesses. There are different types of Rhode Island Motion to Invoke the Rule Prior to Void Dire and To Enjoin the District Attorney From Advising Witnesses of Previous Testimony, which are as follows: 1. Pre-trial Motion: This type of motion is filed before the trial begins and requests the court to invoke the rule, prohibiting the district attorney from discussing or informing witnesses about any previous testimony given by other witnesses involved in the case. This motion aims to safeguard the fairness and impartiality of the trial. 2. In-trial Motion: This motion is filed during the trial proceedings, usually immediately before or during the jury selection process (void dire). It requests the court to enforce the rule, preventing the district attorney from advising potential witnesses about preceding testimonies. The goal is to maintain the integrity of the trial process and ensure that witness accounts are not influenced by external factors. 3. Specific Witness Motion: In some cases, a motion can be filed specifically for a particular witness, usually when there is a concern that the district attorney may have an intention to advise that witness about previous testimonies. This motion targets the protection of a particular witness's testimony from potential influence. It is important to note that each motion involves different timing and circumstances. The objective remains consistent: to ensure that witness testimony is unaffected by any knowledge of prior testimonies. This rule serves to uphold the principles of fairness, maintain the integrity of the legal process, and enable a just trial outcome.