Pennsylvania Jury Instruction - 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CB-7-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.

Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue In Pennsylvania, during a civil trial, the jury has the crucial responsibility to deliberate and determine the facts of the case to reach a fair and just verdict. Jury Instruction — 7.2 addresses the duty to deliberate when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue. This instruction guides the jury on how to approach the evidence and make a decision when it comes to calculating damages or determining their relevance. Key Points: 1. Understanding the dual claim of damages: In some cases, both the plaintiff and defendant may seek damages. The jury must carefully analyze the evidence presented by both parties and consider any counterclaims or cross-claims within the case. 2. Evaluating evidence: The jury should thoroughly review all relevant evidence presented during the trial, including witness testimonies, documents, expert opinions, and any other exhibits that impact the determination of damages. It is crucial for the jury to assess the credibility of each piece of evidence and consider its weight when making their decision. 3. Weighing the parties' arguments: During deliberation, the jury must carefully consider the arguments made by both the plaintiff and the defendant regarding damages. They should evaluate each side's perspective, including any mitigating or aggravating factors, and assess the credibility and strength of each party's claims. 4. Factoring in applicable law: While deliberating, the jury needs to be mindful of the relevant Pennsylvania laws and legal principles regarding damages. Pennsylvania's law may define specific types of damages, such as compensatory, punitive, or nominal damages, which need to be understood and applied correctly based on the evidence presented. 5. Determining the appropriate damages (if applicable): If the jury finds that damages are a crucial issue in the case, they must carefully assess the evidence and apply the appropriate legal standards to calculate the amount of damages justified by the evidence and the law. This may involve considering medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and any other relevant factors supported by the evidence. Different types of Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue: 1. Jury Duty when Both Parties Claim Damages: This instruction specifically addresses cases where both the plaintiff and defendant seek damages from each other. It provides guidance on how the jury should assess the evidence and determine the appropriate damages for each party. 2. Jury Duty when Damages Are Not an Issue: This instruction pertains to cases where damages are not a disputed matter but still require the jury's careful consideration. The jury is instructed to deliberate on other relevant issues at hand, such as liability or fault, instead of focusing solely on damages. Overall, Jury Instruction — 7.2 emphasizes the importance of the jury's duty to deliberate impartially and thoroughly when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue. Their decision should be based on a careful evaluation of the evidence presented, the parties' arguments, and the applicable law, ensuring a fair and just outcome in the case.