A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
An Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in Oklahoma courts. This affidavit is typically used to challenge a subpoena duces tecum (a request for the production of documents) on the basis that it is burdensome, unnecessary, or violates the rights of the individual or party being subpoenaed. In this affidavit, the affine (the person making the statement) provides a detailed explanation and justification for why the subpoena should be quashed or invalidated. The affidavit aims to persuade the court that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive, and therefore should be considered invalid or modified. Keywords: Oklahoma, affidavit, support, motion to quash subpoena, duces tecum, grounds, unreasonable, oppressive. Different types of affidavits in support of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum in Oklahoma may include: 1. Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum Based on Privilege: This affidavit challenges the subpoena on the grounds that the requested documents are privileged or protected from disclosure by law, such as attorney-client privilege or doctor-patient privilege. 2. Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum Based on Over breadth: This affidavit argues that the subpoena is overly broad and seeks documents that are irrelevant, immaterial, or not reasonably calculated to lead to relevant evidence. 3. Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum Based on Undue Burden: This affidavit asserts that complying with the subpoena would impose an undue burden or hardship on the person or party being subpoenaed, such as excessive time, expense, or effort required for document retrieval and production. 4. Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum Based on Fourth Amendment Rights: This affidavit contends that the subpoena violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, especially if it seeks documents without a valid search warrant or lacks sufficient probable cause. When filing an Oklahoma Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum, it is crucial to consult with an attorney experienced in Oklahoma state laws and civil procedure to ensure the affidavit is appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances of the case.
