Ohio Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-CMP-10058
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This form is a Complaint for an Injunction and Other Relief. The plaintiff asked the court to issue an order enjoining the defendant from further violation of a covenant not to compete in the relevant area. The plaintiff also requests that damages be paid to him/her to compensate for the violation of the covenant.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete
  • Preview Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete

Form popularity

FAQ

Under Ohio law, noncompetition contracts are generally enforceable if they are reasonable.

Covenants not to compete are frequently enforced where the former employer's "confidential information" may be used or disclosed unless the employee is restrained from competing.

California law bars covenants not to compete in nearly all circumstances. In Edwards v. Arthur Anderson, the California Supreme Court determined that the law should be read strictly, and not only void the ?unreasonable? noncompete clause, but all noncompete clauses other than those explicitly allowed in the code.

California law bars covenants not to compete in nearly all circumstances.

Specificity: A non-compete agreement must be specific about the activities it prohibits. Additionally, the covenant must clearly articulate what activities are considered competing and those activities must be substantially similar or related to the work the employee performed for the employer.

The agreement is not enforceable because the time period it covers is too long. The period considered reasonable varies by state but typically ranges from 6 months to two years. Longer agreements will likely be found invalid. The territory covered by the agreement is too large.

Although governed by individual state laws, common factors include whether the employer has a legitimate interest to protect; whether the geographic scope prevents the worker from making a living; the length of restriction; whether the agreement prevents workers from doing different work from what they are doing; and ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Ohio Complaint for Injunction - Covenant not to compete