In Nevada, a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial can be filed when prejudicial statements are made during a trial. This legal motion aims to challenge the fairness of the trial and request either a reversal of the verdict or a new trial altogether. Prejudicial statements can include inappropriate or damaging comments made by a witness, attorney, or even the judge that may significantly impact the outcome of the case. The motion serves as a post-trial remedy, allowing the aggrieved party to argue that the prejudicial statements created an unfair atmosphere, preventing a fair and impartial decision. By filing this motion, the party seeks to overturn the verdict due to the documented prejudicial statements that marred the trial's integrity. There are different types of Motions for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or New Trial, specifically tailored for prejudicial statements: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This motion is filed when the prejudice caused by the statements is substantial and irreparable. The moving argues that the prejudicial statements tainted the trial to such an extent that the original verdict cannot stand. 2. Motion for New Trial: Alternatively, if the Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict is unsuccessful, the moving may opt for a Motion for New Trial. This motion requests a retrial on the basis of the prejudicial statements, asserting that the original trial was fundamentally flawed and that a fair outcome was unattainable. It is important to note that both motions require substantial evidence to prove that the prejudicial statements had a significant impact on the proceedings. The moving must demonstrate that, without the prejudicial statements, the outcome of the trial would likely have been different. The court will carefully evaluate the arguments presented and consider the level of prejudice caused by the statements before rendering a decision on the motion. In conclusion, a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial can be filed in Nevada when prejudicial statements are made during a trial. These motions allow a party to challenge the fairness of the proceedings and seek either a reversal of the verdict or a new trial. By utilizing these legal tools, the moving aims to rectify any potential harm caused by prejudicial statements, advocating for a just and unbiased outcome.