A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
A New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed by a party in a court case to request the cancellation or invalidation of a subpoena duces tecum issued by the opposing party. This affidavit provides detailed information and arguments as to why the subpoena should be quashed. In New Jersey, there could be different types of affidavits used in support of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. These variations may arise depending on the specific circumstances of the case or the grounds on which the moving is challenging the subpoena. Here are a few examples: 1. New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum — Unreasonable Relevance: This type of affidavit argues that the subpoena seeks documents that are not reasonably related to the issues involved in the case. It aims to demonstrate that the requested documents do not have any bearing on the relevant facts or legal claims, rendering the subpoena oppressive and burdensome. 2. New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum Over breadthth: This affidavit asserts that the subpoena is overly broad and seeks documents that are beyond the permissible scope defined by the rules of discovery. It highlights how the requested documents go beyond what is necessary for the resolution of the case, amounting to an oppressive and harassing demand. 3. New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum — Privileged or Protected Information: This type of affidavit argues that the subpoena seeks documents protected by attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, or other forms of legally recognized privilege. It offers specific details on why these documents should not be disclosed, highlighting their confidential and privileged nature. 4. New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum — Privacy Concerns: This affidavit focuses on the invasion of privacy resulting from the subpoena. It highlights how the requested documents contain personal or sensitive information that, if disclosed, would violate the moving's rights to privacy, potentially causing undue harm or harassment. Overall, a New Jersey Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that the Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a crucial legal document used to protect the rights and interests of a party involved in a case. It requires a thorough and detailed explanation of the reasons why the subpoena should be quashed, centering around the concepts of reasonableness, oppression, over breadth, privilege, or privacy concerns.
