Title: North Dakota Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures: An Overview Introduction: In legal proceedings, a Motion in Liming plays a crucial role in pre-trial litigation. Specifically, a Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is filed in cases where introducing evidence of measures taken to rectify a situation may bias or mislead the jury. This article provides a comprehensive understanding of such motions in the context of North Dakota law. Keywords: North Dakota, Motion in Liming, Prevent Evidence, Remedial Measures, types of North Dakota Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures: 1. General Motion in Liming: A general Motion in Liming seeks to preclude the admission of any evidence pertaining to remedial measures taken by the defendant or any party involved in the case. Its primary objective is to prevent the jury from being influenced by post-incident actions rather than focusing on the actual facts and circumstances. 2. Motion in Liming to Exclude Evidence of Repairs: This particular motion aims to exclude evidence related to repairs, such as fixing a defective product, modifying a hazardous area, or maintaining/improving the safety conditions of a property. The rationale behind this motion is to maintain the focus on the liability or negligence of the defendant at the time of the incident and not on subsequent corrective actions. 3. Motion in Liming to Exclude Subsequent Remedial Measures: This motion seeks to prevent the introduction of evidence related to measures taken by a party after an accident or incident has occurred. The objective of this motion is to avoid any prejudice that may arise from the jury considering these voluntary actions as an admission of liability or culpability. 4. Motion in Liming to Exclude Evidence of Industry Standards: In specific cases, this motion can be filed to prohibit introducing evidence about industry standards or guidelines that have been implemented after the incident. The motion argues that these revised standards should not be considered in determining liability as they were not in existence at the time of the alleged negligence or wrongdoing. 5. Motion in Liming to Exclude Evidence of Compliance with Regulations: This motion aims to exclude evidence that highlights the defendant's compliance with legal regulations or governmental standards. It argues that proving compliance may potentially mislead the jury into assuming that adherence to regulations negates any claim of negligence or liability. Conclusion: When it comes to a Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures in North Dakota, the primary objective is to ensure a fair trial without introducing potentially misleading or prejudicial evidence. By understanding the various types of motions mentioned above, legal professionals can effectively utilize them to protect their clients' rights and ensure a just outcome in the courtroom.