North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim is a legal guideline designed to assist juries in understanding and evaluating lawsuits related to allegations of discrimination against individuals with disabilities. This instruction provides a detailed explanation of the legal requirements, principles, and definitions associated with disparate treatment claims under the ADA. Disparate treatment refers to unequal treatment of individuals with disabilities in the workplace or any other public accommodation covered by the ADA. This type of claim occurs when an individual is treated less favorably compared to others due to their disability, resulting in adverse employment actions or exclusion from essential services and benefits. Key elements covered in the North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 ADA Disparate Treatment Claim include: 1. Prohibited Discrimination: This instruction outlines that the ADA prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in employment, public services, public accommodations, and telecommunications. 2. Essential Elements of a Disparate Treatment Claim: It describes the essential elements that the plaintiff needs to prove to establish a disparate treatment claim under the ADA. These elements typically include proving the existence of a disability, demonstrating that the individual is qualified for the job or service, showing adverse treatment based on the disability, and the connection between the adverse treatment and the disability. 3. Reasonable Accommodation: The instruction explains the duty of employers and providers of public services to provide reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities, unless it would impose an undue hardship. 4. Direct and Indirect Evidence: It distinguishes between direct and indirect evidence of discrimination, providing guidance on how to evaluate and weigh different types of evidence presented in a disparate treatment case. 5. Defenses and Burden of Proof: The instruction explains potential defenses available to the defendant, such as business necessity or undue hardship, and clarifies the burden of proof for both the plaintiff and defendant. Different types of North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 ADA Disparate Treatment Claims may include specific variations based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Examples of potential variations might include claims related to employment discrimination, denial of public services, or unequal treatment in public accommodations. Overall, this jury instruction ensures that the jury understands the intricacies of ADA disparate treatment claims under various contexts, providing them with the knowledge necessary to make informed decisions based on the presented evidence.