You can devote several hours on the web trying to find the legitimate record template that meets the federal and state specifications you require. US Legal Forms gives a huge number of legitimate kinds which can be analyzed by professionals. You can actually obtain or printing the North Carolina Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice from the service.
If you already have a US Legal Forms accounts, you may log in and then click the Download key. After that, you may full, change, printing, or sign the North Carolina Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice. Every single legitimate record template you buy is your own property eternally. To obtain one more backup associated with a obtained form, check out the My Forms tab and then click the corresponding key.
Should you use the US Legal Forms web site for the first time, keep to the simple guidelines listed below:
Download and printing a huge number of record themes making use of the US Legal Forms site, which provides the biggest assortment of legitimate kinds. Use expert and state-particular themes to handle your organization or person demands.
You are a defendant in a criminal case ? As an extension of the Fifth Amendment, any criminal defendant cannot be forced to testify in a courtroom. You should definitely consult with an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer for San Francisco, CA.
Corroborating evidence is evidence that strengthens or confirms already existing evidence. In courts, it is used to support the testimony of a witness. For example, California has a statute that defines corroborating evidence in the context of a conviction.
The nature of corroboration is that it is confirmatory evidence and it may consist of the evidence of second witness or of circumstances like the conduct of the person against whom it is required. Corroboration must connect or tend to connect the accused with the crime.
There's cases called Aranda-Bruton Rule. These cases stand for the proposition that yes, at a preliminary hearing a co-defendant's statement can come in against another co-defendant and against them as an admission even if the defense attorney doesn't have an opportunity to cross-examine that co-defendant.
Corroboration is the ability to compare information provided by two separate sources and find similarities between them. When a second source provides the same or similar information to the first, the second source is considered to corroborate (e.g. support, or agree with) with the first.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.
"A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime."
A defendant may not be convicted of any offense upon the testimony of an accomplice unsupported by corroborative evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of such offense.