You might spend hours online searching for the valid document template that meets the state and federal requirements you need.
US Legal Forms offers a vast array of legal documents that can be reviewed by experts.
You can easily download or print the Maine Motion to Prevent the Prosecution from Utilizing Peremptory Challenges to Exclude Black Individuals and Members of Other Groups from my service.
If available, utilize the Review button to examine the document template as well. If you wish to acquire another version of the form, use the Search field to find the template that meets your requirements. Once you have located the template you desire, click Get now to proceed. Select the pricing plan you want, enter your details, and register for your account on US Legal Forms. Complete the transaction. You may use your credit card or PayPal account to pay for the legal form. Choose the format of the document and download it to your system. Make adjustments to the document if necessary. You can complete, modify, sign, and print the Maine Motion to Prevent the Prosecution from Utilizing Peremptory Challenges to Exclude Black Individuals and Members of Other Groups. Obtain and print a multitude of document templates using the US Legal Forms site, which offers the largest selection of legal forms. Utilize professional and state-specific templates to address your business or personal needs.
In Batson v. Kentucky the court ruled that eliminating potential jurors based on race violated both the 6th Amendment's guarantee of a fair trial and the 14th Amendment's equal protection under the law. This landmark case was and still is a crucial victory toward achieving a more fair and representative legal system.
Independently, each side may exercise some limited number of peremptory strikes to excuse additional jurors without offering a reason. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that peremptory challenges cannot be used to systematically strike prospective jurors from the panel on the basis of race (Batson v.
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case?the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so?may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race.
Once a Batson challenge is raised by the defense lawyer, the trial court will then conduct a 3- step analysis: The defendant or the defense lawyer must make in initial showing (called a prima facie showing) that the prosecutor's peremptory challenge was based on race or another impermissible ground.
In Batson, the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant can make a prima facie case for purposeful racial discrimination in jury selection. The term ?Batson challenge? refers to an objection to an opposing party's use of a peremptory strike to exclude a juror from the jury pool on the basis of race.
Reasoning: (Powell, J.): In a 7?2 decision, the Court held that, while a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race.
A peremptory challenge results in the exclusion of a potential juror without the need for any reason or explanation - unless the opposing party presents a prima facie argument that this challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex.