Indiana Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures is a legal procedure used to request the court to exclude any evidence related to actions taken after an alleged incident, aimed at remedying or improving the situation. This motion serves as a preventative measure to exclude evidence that might bias or prejudice the jury and focuses solely on the facts and circumstances at the time the incident occurred. In Indiana, there are different types of Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures, including: 1. Historical Context Motion: This type of motion is used when the defense seeks to exclude any evidence regarding remedial measures taken by the defendant or the party responsible for the alleged incident before it occurred. The goal is to ensure that the jury's decision is based solely on the circumstances at the time of the incident, rather than subsequent measures taken to improve the situation. 2. Future Remedial Measures Motion: This motion aims to prevent the introduction of evidence related to actions or improvements made by the defendant or the responsible party after the alleged incident took place. It argues that such evidence is irrelevant to the issues at hand and may unduly influence the jury's perception of liability. 3. Settlement Offers/Compromise Motion: This type of motion seeks to exclude any evidence of settlement offers or compromises made by one party to the other after the incident occurred. It argues that introducing such evidence can unduly influence the jury's perception of liability, thereby prejudicing the trial. The purpose of these various motions is to maintain the fairness and impartiality of the trial by ensuring that the evidence presented reflects the circumstances and facts surrounding the incident, rather than subsequent efforts to remedy the situation. The Indiana Motion in Liming to Prevent Evidence of Remedial Measures allows the court to consider only relevant and admissible evidence, ultimately promoting a just outcome.