It is possible to invest hours online attempting to find the lawful papers format that suits the federal and state specifications you want. US Legal Forms supplies a huge number of lawful varieties which can be analyzed by pros. You can actually down load or produce the Georgia Sample Letter for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories from your support.
If you currently have a US Legal Forms accounts, it is possible to log in and click on the Acquire switch. Afterward, it is possible to comprehensive, edit, produce, or indication the Georgia Sample Letter for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories. Each lawful papers format you buy is yours forever. To acquire one more version for any acquired type, visit the My Forms tab and click on the corresponding switch.
If you work with the US Legal Forms website the first time, adhere to the easy recommendations below:
Acquire and produce a huge number of papers layouts while using US Legal Forms site, which provides the largest selection of lawful varieties. Use skilled and state-specific layouts to take on your small business or person requirements.
You have to respond to interrogatories in writing to the best of your ability. If you do not answer an interrogatory question, and then the other side learns that you did in fact know the answer, it could have a negative impact on your case at trial.
A motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is a prime example. (This is where you've received responses to interrogatories, believe them to be incomplete, and you want the court to order the responding party to provide further responses.)
There is a limit to the number of interrogatories that each party can send. It varies by state but in Georgia, the limit is 50. The number of the limit refers to the number of questions that are sent to each defendant (or received to be answered by the plaintiff).
You can use interrogatories to find out facts about a case but they cannot be used for questions that draw a legal conclusion.
Rule 33(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is ...
Answer only the question that is asked, and avoid the temptation to over-explain your answer. If the question contains several parts, you may break your answer into parts as well. It is also possible that you might object to the question.
Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them.