Florida Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue is a legal instruction that guides the behavior of the jury during a trial in Florida. This instruction is important in cases where both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not a significant issue. By providing clear guidelines, this instruction ensures that the jury performs its duty of carefully considering the evidence and reaching a fair verdict. In cases where both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages, the Florida Jury Instruction — 7.2 reminds the jury of their responsibility to deliberate and carefully assess the evidence presented by both parties. It emphasizes the importance of impartiality and fair judgment by requiring the jury to consider each party's arguments and evidence before making a decision. The instruction discourages favoritism or bias towards one party and reminds the jury to base their verdict solely on the facts and evidence presented during the trial. When damages are not a significant issue, the instruction is still relevant as it serves as a reminder to the jury that their duty to deliberate and reach a verdict remains unchanged. Even if the question of damages is not contentious, the jury must still carefully evaluate the evidence, listen to the legal instructions provided by the judge, and deliberate until they have reached a unanimous decision. It is crucial for the jury to understand that deliberation involves open and honest discussion among all members to consider the merits of each party's claims. The Florida Jury Instruction — 7.2 highlights that jury members should not hesitate to express their opinions, question inconsistencies, probe evidence, and engage in meaningful dialogue. By doing so, the jury can better evaluate the credibility of witnesses, weigh the strength of evidence, and ultimately arrive at a just and equitable verdict. Different types of Florida Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue may address specific legal issues or scenarios. For example, there could be variations of the instruction that pertain to different types of cases, such as personal injury, contract disputes, or property damage claims. These variations would tailor the instruction to the specific circumstances and legal requirements of the case at hand. In conclusion, the Florida Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue outlines the responsibilities of the jury when it comes to carefully considering evidence and reaching a fair verdict. It ensures that the jury remains impartial, focuses on the facts, and engages in meaningful deliberation to make an informed decision in cases where damages are claimed by both parties or when damages are not a significant issue. Keywords: Florida Jury Instruction, duty to deliberate, plaintiff and defendant, claim damages, damages not an issue, trial, evidence, verdict, impartiality, fair judgment, legal instruction, merits, credibility, witnesses, open discussion, equitable verdict.