District of Columbia Agreement to Survey and Fix Location of Known Common Boundary

• Category: Real Estate - Boundary Lines
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-1090BG
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This agreement operates as an accord and satisfaction. Although the definition is variously stated from state to state, generally speaking, an "accord and satisfaction" is a method of discharging a contract or a claim or cause of action whereby the parties agree to give and accept something other than that which is due in satisfaction of the existing claim. For an accord and satisfaction, the "accord" is the agreement between the parties, and the "satisfaction" is its execution or performance. An accord and satisfaction results when: (i) the parties mutually intend to effect a settlement of an existing dispute by entering into a superseding agreement, and (ii) there is actual performance in accordance with the new agreement. Accord and satisfaction requires both components4 as without an agreement to discharge the obligation, there can be no accord, and without an accord, there can be no satisfaction.

The District of Columbia Agreement to Survey and Fix Location of Known Common Boundary is a legal document used to establish and define the boundaries between different jurisdictions within the District of Columbia. This agreement is crucial for ensuring clarity and accuracy in determining the exact location of these boundaries, helping to avoid disputes and misunderstandings in the future. One type of District of Columbia Agreement to Survey and Fix Location of Known Common Boundary is the interstate boundary agreement. This type of agreement is made between neighboring states that share a common boundary within the District of Columbia. It involves a thorough survey and assessment of the physical markers and landmarks that define the boundary, and details how any discrepancies or ambiguities will be resolved. Another type of agreement is the municipal boundary agreement. This agreement is made between different municipalities or local government entities within the District of Columbia. It aims to establish and fix the boundaries between these jurisdictions, ensuring that there is a clear understanding of where one municipality ends and another begins. This type of agreement is particularly significant in urban areas where multiple municipalities coexist. The District of Columbia Agreement to Survey and Fix Location of Known Common Boundary includes several key elements. First, it identifies the parties involved in the agreement, which may include states, municipalities, and other entities. It also includes a detailed description of the boundary line, referencing specific survey markers and physical features. Any relevant maps or plats are attached as exhibits to further illustrate the boundary location. Furthermore, the agreement outlines the process for conducting surveys, including the use of professional surveyors and the standards and methods to be applied. It includes provisions for resolving any discrepancies or disputes that may arise during the survey, such as through arbitration or mediation. The agreement may also address ongoing maintenance and upkeep of the boundary markers and provide for periodic reviews to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the established boundary. In conclusion, the District of Columbia Agreement to Survey and Fix Location of Known Common Boundary is a critical legal tool for establishing, defining, and maintaining the boundaries within the District of Columbia. By ensuring accuracy and clarity, this agreement helps prevent conflicts and disputes between neighboring states and municipalities. The various types of agreements, such as interstate and municipal boundary agreements, address different scenarios and entities within the District, ensuring that each jurisdiction knows its limits and responsibilities.