This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum.
Connecticut Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-PI-0042
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Rule 1.10 - Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule (a) While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rules 1.7, 1.8(c), or 1.9, unless the prohibition is based on a personal interest of the ...
A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...
Regulatory Scheme: Connecticut Rule of Professional Conduct 7.4A permits attorneys to state or imply that they are certified specialists where certification is granted "by a board or other entity which is approved by the Rules Committee of the Superior Court." [Rule 7.4A].
Motions for orders of compliance (or motions to compel, as they are frequently called) are governed by Section 13-14 of the Connecticut Practice Book. As in many jurisdictions, judges in Connecticut generally prefer that parties and their counsel resolve discovery disputes without the need for judicial intervention.
Rule 1.7 - Conflict of Interest: General Rule (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest.
Rule 7.1. A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading.
A motion to quash refers to a specific type of request, in which one court is asked to render the decision made by another, lower court as invalid. A motion to quash example would be if a party experienced improper service of process.
A Deposition Subpoena differs from the Subpoena DucesTecum in that the documents and testimony requested are part of the ?discovery process? before trial and may not be used in an actual court hearing.
