Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense: The Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is an essential part of the legal process in Connecticut civil cases involving negligence claims. This instruction explains the concept of comparative negligence and its application in determining liability and damages. Keywords: Connecticut, Jury Instruction, 7.7.1, General Instruction, Comparative Negligence Defense. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that allows the jury to apportion the fault or responsibility for an accident or injury between the plaintiff and the defendant. Under this defense, if the plaintiff is found to have contributed to their injuries through their own negligence or carelessness, their recovery of damages can be reduced proportionally. Connecticut recognizes the doctrine of modified comparative negligence, specifically the 51% rule. This means that the plaintiff can still recover damages as long as their level of fault does not exceed 50%. If the plaintiff's negligence is determined to be 51% or higher, they are barred from recovering any damages. Instructions related to Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense may cover various scenarios and legal nuances based on the specific circumstances of the case. Some possible variations or types of instructions that fall under this category include: 1. Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense — Ordinary Negligence: This instruction applies when both the plaintiff and defendant are alleged to have acted negligently, and the jury must determine the percentage of fault for each party. 2. Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense — Imputed Negligence: This instruction deals with cases where the plaintiff's negligence is imputed to another party, such as an employer or joint toreador, affecting the apportionment of fault. 3. Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense — Comparative Fault and Multiple Defendants: This instruction is relevant in cases involving multiple defendants where each defendant's percentage of fault is assessed individually, and the jury must determine the contribution of each party to the plaintiff's injuries. It is important for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented, evaluate the credibility of witnesses, and apply the relevant legal standards when determining comparative negligence. The instructions provide guidance and clarity to the jury, ensuring a fair and just verdict while taking into account the shares of fault assigned to the plaintiff and the defendant(s). Overall, the Connecticut Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense plays a crucial role in instructing the jury about the application of comparative negligence principles, providing guidelines to help them reach a rightful and equitable decision in negligence cases.