This form addresses the rights and responsibilities where Where a well authorized under the terms of this Agreement by all parties (or by less than all parties under Article VI.B.2.) has been drilled to the objective depth and the parties participating in the well cannot agree on the sequence and timing of further operations regarding the well
Arizona Priority of Operations For 1982 Agreement
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-OG-713
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
How to fill out Priority Of Operations For 1982 Agreement?
Have you been in the placement that you need to have documents for sometimes organization or person purposes nearly every day? There are plenty of lawful document templates available on the net, but discovering versions you can rely on is not straightforward. US Legal Forms offers thousands of type templates, like the Arizona Priority of Operations For 1982 Agreement, which are composed to meet federal and state demands.
If you are currently acquainted with US Legal Forms website and possess your account, merely log in. Next, you can down load the Arizona Priority of Operations For 1982 Agreement web template.
If you do not offer an bank account and wish to begin using US Legal Forms, follow these steps:
- Discover the type you require and make sure it is for that proper town/county.
- Use the Review button to review the form.
- Look at the explanation to actually have chosen the appropriate type.
- When the type is not what you`re searching for, make use of the Look for discipline to get the type that meets your requirements and demands.
- When you find the proper type, click on Get now.
- Opt for the pricing plan you would like, submit the necessary information and facts to generate your bank account, and pay money for the transaction with your PayPal or bank card.
- Choose a practical data file formatting and down load your duplicate.
Locate every one of the document templates you possess purchased in the My Forms food selection. You can aquire a more duplicate of Arizona Priority of Operations For 1982 Agreement any time, if necessary. Just click the required type to down load or produce the document web template.
Use US Legal Forms, one of the most extensive collection of lawful kinds, to conserve time as well as stay away from faults. The service offers professionally made lawful document templates that you can use for a selection of purposes. Generate your account on US Legal Forms and initiate producing your life a little easier.
Form popularity
FAQ
Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332 (1982), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving antitrust law. A society of doctors in Maricopa County, Arizona, established maximum fees that their members could claim for seeing patients who were covered by certain health insurance plans.
It decided that a fair division of the first 7,500,000 acre-feet of such mainstream waters would give 4,400,000 acre-feet to California, 2,800,000 to Arizona, and 300,000 to Nevada, and that Arizona and California should each get one-half of any surplus.
The Arizona v. California Supreme Court case settled a longstanding dispute over claims to Colorado River waters in the river's Lower Basin. In this landmark decision, the Court issued an opinion in 1963 and a decree in 1964. Arizona filed its original suit against California in the Supreme Court in 1952.
In a 5-3 decision, the court held that federal law preempted three provisions of Arizona's law: The provision making it a state crime to reside in the country without legal permission. The provision making it a state crime to work in the country without legal permission.
In a 1964 decree, the Court specified the water entitlements for the parties and the reservations, but held that the water rights for the reservations would be subject to adjustment in the event that the reservations' disputed boundaries were finally determined.
The Arizona v. California Supreme Court case settled a longstanding dispute over claims to Colorado River waters in the river's Lower Basin. In this landmark decision, the Court issued an opinion in 1963 and a decree in 1964. Arizona filed its original suit against California in the Supreme Court in 1952.
Holding: The 1868 treaty establishing the Navajo Reservation reserved necessary water to accomplish the purpose of the Navajo Reservation but did not require the United States to take affirmative steps to secure water for the tribe. Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 22, 2023.
