You are able to spend hours online looking for the legal record template that fits the state and federal specifications you want. US Legal Forms offers a huge number of legal varieties that are analyzed by pros. You can actually obtain or print out the Arizona Jury Instruction - 3.1 Life Expectancy In General from the support.
If you have a US Legal Forms accounts, you are able to log in and click the Obtain option. Afterward, you are able to total, modify, print out, or sign the Arizona Jury Instruction - 3.1 Life Expectancy In General. Each and every legal record template you purchase is your own property forever. To have another duplicate of the purchased kind, go to the My Forms tab and click the related option.
If you are using the US Legal Forms internet site initially, follow the simple instructions listed below:
Obtain and print out a huge number of record layouts while using US Legal Forms website, which offers the biggest variety of legal varieties. Use expert and state-particular layouts to handle your business or personal requirements.
You must ask the court for punitive damages, although you may not specify an amount. There is no set formula for determining the amount of punitive damages in California. Punitive damages serve to deter future misconduct and punish the defendant. ?Punitive damages? also goes by the name ?exemplary damages?.
The standard of proof to recover punitive damages is ?clear and convincing? evidence of the defendant's ?evil hand and mind.? This means the plaintiff must present strong evidence that is highly and substantially more probable to be true than not true.
Punitive Damages [Name of defendant] consciously pursued a course of conduct knowing that it created a substantial risk of significant harm to others. To prove this required state of mind by clear and convincing evidence, [name of plaintiff] must persuade you that the punitive damages claim is highly probable.
In considering the amount of any punitive damages, consider the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct [, including whether the conduct that harmed the plaintiff was particularly reprehensible because it also caused actual harm or posed a substantial risk of harm to people who are not parties to this ...
418, the California Supreme Court articulated 'three guideposts' for courts reviewing punitive damages: ?(1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct; (2) the disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damages award; and (3) the difference between the ...