Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-00892
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This is a sample jury instruction, whereby the court instructs the jury to regard certain testimony with hightened suspicion. Care must be taken that the language of the instruction is proper in your state and not subject to reversal on appeal.

Title: Understanding Arizona's Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice: Types and Implications Introduction: Arizona's legal system recognizes the concept of uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice when evaluating criminal cases involving multiple offenders. This detailed description aims to shed light on the various aspects of Arizona's uncorroborated testimony of accomplice, including its definition, requirements, implications, and its different types. Definition and Requirements: Uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice refers to the statements made by an individual involved in the commission of a crime, often referred to as an accomplice. In Arizona, for this testimony to be considered credible and reliable, it must adhere to specific requirements outlined by the courts. These requirements generally include voluntary admission, personal knowledge of the crime, and supportive evidence. Implications: The presence of uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice holds a significant impact on the outcome of criminal cases in Arizona. This type of evidence plays a vital role in establishing the guilt or innocence of the accused. However, it is essential to evaluate the credibility of such testimony, as it may be prone to bias, manipulation, or personal interest. Types of Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice: 1. Main Accomplice Testimony: This type of uncorroborated testimony comes from the primary offender who admits their involvement in the crime and implicates other co-defendants. The credibility and reliability of this accomplice are closely scrutinized due to their central role in the commission of the offense. 2. Secondary Accomplice Testimony: Secondary accomplice testimony refers to statements provided by individuals who were not the principal participants in the crime but had some level of involvement or knowledge about it. Their testimony can further corroborate the main accomplice's account or provide additional details about the offense. 3. Multiple Accomplice Testimonies: In cases involving multiple offenders, Arizona may encounter multiple accomplice testimonies. These testimonies may vary in terms of their consistency, credibility, and level of detail. The court needs to carefully assess each testimony individually and collectively to determine the accuracy of the events and the culpability of the accused parties. Conclusion: Arizona's uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice plays a crucial role in evaluating the guilt or innocence of individuals involved in criminal activities. However, it is important to meticulously analyze the credibility and reliability of such testimony due to its potential susceptibility to bias and manipulation. By understanding the different types of uncorroborated accomplice testimony, one can gain insights into Arizona's legal framework and the inherent complexities surrounding its application in criminal proceedings.

How to fill out Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony Of Accomplice?

US Legal Forms - among the greatest libraries of authorized varieties in America - provides an array of authorized file themes you may down load or print out. While using internet site, you can get a large number of varieties for organization and specific reasons, sorted by classes, suggests, or key phrases.You will discover the newest types of varieties much like the Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice within minutes.

If you have a monthly subscription, log in and down load Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice from your US Legal Forms catalogue. The Down load switch can look on every single develop you perspective. You get access to all earlier downloaded varieties from the My Forms tab of the accounts.

In order to use US Legal Forms the first time, allow me to share simple directions to help you started out:

  • Ensure you have picked out the proper develop for your metropolis/state. Click on the Preview switch to review the form`s information. Look at the develop information to actually have selected the proper develop.
  • In the event the develop doesn`t fit your demands, use the Research field at the top of the display to discover the one that does.
  • When you are content with the shape, confirm your selection by simply clicking the Acquire now switch. Then, opt for the costs strategy you want and supply your accreditations to sign up for the accounts.
  • Procedure the deal. Utilize your charge card or PayPal accounts to perform the deal.
  • Pick the formatting and down load the shape on the gadget.
  • Make adjustments. Complete, modify and print out and signal the downloaded Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice.

Each and every design you included in your money does not have an expiration time and it is your own for a long time. So, in order to down load or print out an additional version, just go to the My Forms segment and click around the develop you require.

Gain access to the Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice with US Legal Forms, probably the most comprehensive catalogue of authorized file themes. Use a large number of professional and status-distinct themes that fulfill your organization or specific requirements and demands.

Form popularity

FAQ

In certain situations there must be corroborative evidence in addition to the suspect evidence in order to convict someone. Corroborative evidence is additional evidence which connects the accused to the crime. Corroboration warnings are also used to protect people from being convicted based on suspect evidence.

Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act says that an accomplice shall be a competent witness as against the accused person and a conviction the accused based on the testimony of an accomplice is valid even though it is not corroborated in material particulars.

An ?accomplice? means a witness in a criminal action who, ing to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be considered to have participated in: (a) The offense charged; or (b) An offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or conduct which constitute the offense charged.

An ?accomplice witness? is someone who is both a witness to a crime and an accomplice in that same crime; one who participates with the defendant before, during, or after the commission of the crime.

An accomplice is a cooperator or participator, commonly in criminal acts. So you're an accomplice to the gas station robbery if you distracted the store manager while your partner in crime raided the registers for cash.

"A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime."

Accomplice, in law, a person who becomes equally guilty in the crime of another by knowingly and voluntarily aiding the other to commit the offense. An accomplice is either an accessory or an abettor. The accessory aids a criminal prior to the crime, whereas the abettor aids the offender during the crime itself.

An accomplice is defined as a person who knowingly, voluntarily, or intentionally gives assistance to another in (or in some cases fails to prevent another from) the commission of a crime. An accomplice is criminally liable to the same extent as the principal.

Interesting Questions

More info

Oct 26, 2020 — Under this case, the rule concerns the sufficiency of the evidence, and the court must "instruct the jury that it cannot conclude a defendant ... Under this section the corroboration of the accomplice's testimony that an offense was committed, or of the circumstances thereof, is not sufficient. It must be ...May 13, 2019 — The common law rule is that an accused may be convicted upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. In many of the states, including the ... by CJ Saverda · 1990 · Cited by 48 — In other words, even if the jury hears the testimony, uncorroborated accomplice testimony, under this Note's proposal, is not enough to convict the defendant. by YA Beeman · 1987 · Cited by 44 — See, e.g., Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 (1978) (questioning of seriously wounded defendant in intensive care and transcription of defendant's written answers. It has long been' a rule of practice for the judge' to warn the jury of the danger of convicting a prisoner on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice or ... Mar 26, 2020 — It lays down that an accomplice has to be proved as a competent witness for a conviction, legal to rely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an ... In Apelt, a lesser culpable accomplice was granted full immunity in exchange for her confession and implication of the defendant in the crime, and her testimony ... Make use of the Search field at the top of the web page if you want to look for another file. Click Buy Now and choose an ideal pricing plan. Create an account ... Defendant urges that the complaining witness was an accomplice and, as such, his testimony must be corroborated. The State's position is that the complaining ...

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Arizona Uncorroborated Testimony of Accomplice