Alaska Motion to Preclude the Prosecution from Using Peremptory Challenges to Exclude Black Persons and Members of Other Groups
Description
How to fill out Motion To Preclude The Prosecution From Using Peremptory Challenges To Exclude Black Persons And Members Of Other Groups?
Are you currently in a circumstance where you require documentation for occasional business or personal motives almost every workday.
There are numerous valid document templates accessible online, but finding forms you can trust is challenging.
US Legal Forms offers a vast array of form templates, such as the Alaska Motion to Prevent the Prosecution from Utilizing Peremptory Challenges to Exclude Black Individuals and Members of Other Groups, which can be drafted to meet state and federal requirements.
Once you find the appropriate form, click on Purchase now.
Select the pricing plan you want, fill in the necessary information to create your account, and pay for the transaction using your PayPal or credit card.
- If you are already familiar with the US Legal Forms website and have an account, simply Log In.
- After that, you can download the Alaska Motion to Prevent the Prosecution from Utilizing Peremptory Challenges to Exclude Black Individuals and Members of Other Groups template.
- If you do not possess an account and wish to start using US Legal Forms, follow these steps.
- Obtain the form you need and make sure it is for the correct area/county.
- Utilize the Review button to evaluate the form.
- Check the summary to confirm you have selected the correct form.
- If the form is not what you're looking for, use the Search section to find the form that meets your needs.
Form popularity
FAQ
Reasoning: (Powell, J.): In a 7?2 decision, the Court held that, while a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race.
1965Exclusion Of Jurors Based On Race Unconstitutional In Swain v. Alabama , the U.S. Supreme Court holds that prosecutors cannot use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors of a particular race (as it had ruled earlier about ethnic groups).
In J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution prohibits gender-based peremptory challenges to prospective jurors.
In Batson v. Kentucky, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the prosecution may not use peremptory strikes to exclude a potential juror based on race.
Independently, each side may exercise some limited number of peremptory strikes to excuse additional jurors without offering a reason. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that peremptory challenges cannot be used to systematically strike prospective jurors from the panel on the basis of race (Batson v.
In 1986, the Supreme Court of the United States placed a limitation on that power through its decision that it is unconstitutional to use a peremptory challenge because of the individual's race (Batson v. Kentucky, 1986).
Substantively, parties exercising peremptory challenges are limited by a line of Supreme Court precedent, starting with Batson v. Kentucky, which precludes the use of certain types of discriminatory peremptory challenges. Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
