Are you presently in a role where you require documents for potential business or specific tasks nearly every day.
There are numerous legitimate document templates available online, but locating forms you can trust is not easy.
US Legal Forms provides thousands of template forms, such as the Alaska Motion to Bar Introduction of Any Evidence Relating to Prior Convictions or Bad Acts, designed to comply with federal and state regulations.
Avoid altering or removing any HTML tags. Only synonymize plain text outside of the HTML tags.
(a) If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qual- ified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.
1002. This rule, modeled after Federal Rule 1002, is the familiar part of the Best Evidence Rule requiring the production of the original to prove the contents of a writing, recording or photograph. See Rule 1001(1) and 1001(2) for definitions of the terms used in this rule.
Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim or its ...
402 Relevant Evidence Admissible?Exceptions?Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible. 403 Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time. 404 Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct?Exceptions?Other Crimes.
Rule 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence deals with the impeachment of a witness by evidence that the witness has been previously convicted of a crime.
Evid. 609. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime (a)General Rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime is only admissible if the crime involved dishonesty or false statement.
The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue ...