Title: Understanding the Deadlines for Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment in California Introduction: In the legal process of litigation in California, a crucial stage is the filing of a motion for summary judgment. If a party wishes to challenge this motion, they must submit an opposition before the designated deadline. This article aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the deadlines and types of opposition to a motion for summary judgment in California. 1. General Deadline for Opposition: The general deadline for opposition to a motion for summary judgment in California is set at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. This timeframe allows ample preparation for the opposing party to gather evidence, investigate claims, and construct a solid argument against the motion. 2. Additional Permissible Time: In case the motion is served by mail, the opposing party is entitled to an additional five calendar days to respond. However, if served electronically, the response deadline remains unchanged. 3. Extension of Time: It is possible to request an extension of time to file an opposition to a motion for summary judgment, subject to the approval of the court. The requesting party should provide valid reasons such as the need for further investigation, discovery constraints, or medical emergencies affecting the preparation time. 4. Types of Opposition: a) Opposition Memorandum: This is the most common form of opposition to a motion for summary judgment. The opposing party must present a detailed memorandum outlining the disputed facts, legal arguments, supporting citations, and any additional evidence to counter the factual claims made in the motion. b) Declarations and Affidavits: To strengthen the opposition, the party may submit declarations from witnesses or relevant experts. These documents help provide firsthand accounts, expert opinions, or professional expertise to counter the claims made in the summary judgment motion. c) Supporting Exhibits: Opposing parties can include supporting exhibits relevant to their opposition. Documents, photographs, contracts, emails, records, or any other evidence that directly or indirectly refute the assertions made in the motion can be presented. d) Response to Evidence: If the moving party presents new evidence or attempts to dispute the opposing party's evidence, a response to evidence can be included in the opposition. This part of the opposition aims to refute any misstatements, inaccuracies, or incorrect interpretations of the evidence presented in the motion. Conclusion: Navigating the deadlines for opposition to a motion for summary judgment in California is crucial for any party engaged in litigation. Adhering to the specific timeframes mentioned, filing detailed opposition memoranda, presenting supportive declarations and exhibits, and adequately addressing any evidence or claims presented in the motion can significantly impact the outcome of the case. Consulting with experienced legal professionals is advised to ensure compliance with the complex rules and procedures involved in opposition to a motion for summary judgment in California.