Knowingly publishing a lie about another person would be libel if that lie damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject. If the damaging lie was spoken rather than written, then it would be slander.
California Civil Code section 46 provides that slander is a false, unprivileged publication that is spoken and that does any of these: (1) charges the victim with a crime, (2) imputes to the victim the existence of a contagious, infectious, or loathsome disease, (3) tends directly to injure the victim with regard to ...
In many cases, the harassment remains verbal. However, as long as the victim faces disruption to their ability to work safely, any action could fall under the category of harassment. Needless to say, rumors and slander attack the reputation of an individual and can make it difficult or even impossible to work safely.
In order to meet the elements for a defamation cause of action, a successful action must include: A false and defamatory statement about another. The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (not including the person defamed by the statement)
California, though, is not one of the U.S. states with criminal defamation laws. While California defamation defendants do not face potential imprisonment, they could be subject to civil lawsuits and hefty damages (including punitive damages), depending on the nature and harm caused by their false statements.
In general, pursuing a defamation lawsuit may be worthwhile if: The defamatory statement(s) are demonstrably false and have caused significant harm to your reputation or career. You have strong evidence to support your claim. The potential damages are substantial enough to justify the costs and risks of litigation.
In California, you must prove five elements to establish a defamation claim: An intentional publication of a statement of fact; That is false; That is unprivileged; That has a natural tendency to injure or causes “special damage;” and, The defendant's fault in publishing the statement amounted to at least negligence.
In an action for slander, the plaintiff must prove special damages, namely proof of actual pecuniary loss, unless the statement complained of falls into one of the four “per se” categories of defamation requiring no proof of special damage: allegations that (1) plaintiff committed a crime, (2) are likely to cause ...
The most effective response is to refuse to be intimidated and, if possible, to expose the threat. In summary, when you are defamed, ignore it if possible and get on with your life. If the attacks are too damaging or persistent, try to expose the perpetrator.
Send a Cease and Desist Letter: Often, a formal letter from a lawyer indicating the defamatory nature of the statements and demanding their cessation can resolve the issue. File a Lawsuit for Damages: If the defamation has caused significant harm, a lawsuit may be the appropriate step to claim damages.