Difference Between Slander And Libel For Public Figure In Houston
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The statement must be untrue and presented as a factual claim rather than an opinion to be defamation. Additionally, there must be evidence that the statement caused or has the potential to cause significant damage to the reputation of the individual or entity targeted.
If they are written, they are considered libel. If they are spoken, they are considered slander. If a person suffers injury to their reputation as a result of another person's statements, they can sue through a defamation claim.
A public figure must prove that a Defendant acted with 'actual malice' in publishing a false statement about the plaintiff. Actual malice means that the person either knew the statement was false or showed such reckless disregard for the truth that they should have known the statement was false.
Section 119.202 - Criminal Slander or Libel, Tex. Fin. Code § 119.202 | Casetext Search + Citator.
Texas law lets you seek compensation for this. If you can show that their untrue statements caused you harm, you might be able to take legal action against the individual or company responsible. Actually, there are two distinct legal claims that divide defamation of character.
Libel is an untrue defamatory statement that is made in writing. Slander is an untrue defamatory statement that is spoken orally. The difference between defamation and slander is that a defamatory statement can be made in any medium. It could be in a blog comment or spoken in a speech or said on television.
Slander can be hard to prove, as the complainant must show the slanderer was driven by malice and knew their claims were false. Slander is different from libel, which are false statements made through print or broadcast.
Second, libel is actionable per se (i.e. without proof of damage) whereas slander, subject to exceptions (see below), is actionable only upon proof of 'special' damage (actual damage is probably a less misleading and therefore better phrase to use though)
The most common defenses to defamation are: 1) truth; 2) consent; 3) privilege; and 4) the statute of limitations. Perhaps the most distinct aspect of the defamation cause of action is that falsity is required. In other words, the statement publicized about the plaintiff must be false in order to prove defamation.
